Report an error
Arson in Oregon correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Brenda | r=0.94 | 38yrs | Yes! |
Average length of Computerphile YouTube videos | r=0.9 | 10yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Belgium | r=0.89 | 38yrs | No |
Average number of comments on MrBeast's YouTube videos | r=0.88 | 11yrs | No |
NASA's budget as a percentage of the total US Federal Budget | r=0.87 | 38yrs | No |
Milk consumption | r=0.86 | 32yrs | No |
US milk fat used to produce cottage cheese | r=0.79 | 22yrs | No |
Annual count of part-time employees in the United States | r=-0.93 | 33yrs | No |
Arson in Oregon also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)