Report an error
Arson in Missouri correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Gasoline pumped in United Kingdom | r=0.97 | 38yrs | Yes! |
Milk consumption | r=0.97 | 32yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Ruben | r=0.96 | 38yrs | No |
The number of postal service machine operators in Missouri | r=0.95 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Claudia | r=0.94 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Nickolas | r=0.94 | 38yrs | No |
Ice cream consumption | r=0.93 | 32yrs | No |
Sherbet consumption | r=0.92 | 32yrs | No |
US household spending on prescription drugs | r=0.9 | 23yrs | No |
Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale | r=0.89 | 21yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Missouri | r=0.88 | 23yrs | No |
The marriage rate in Missouri | r=0.82 | 23yrs | No |
Arson in Missouri also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)