Report an error
US household spending on tobacco products and smoking supplies correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of executive administrative assistants in North Carolina | r=0.98 | 13yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in linguistics | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
Pirate attacks globally | r=0.95 | 14yrs | No |
Burglaries in Kansas | r=0.88 | 23yrs | No |
Air pollution in Akron, Ohio | r=0.81 | 23yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'can texas secede from the union' | r=0.68 | 18yrs | No |
US household spending on tobacco products and smoking supplies also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)