Report an error
US household spending on healthcare correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Biomass power generated in Brazil | r=0.99 | 22yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Juliette | r=0.98 | 23yrs | No |
| Patents granted in the US | r=0.98 | 21yrs | No |
| The distance between Saturn and the Sun | r=0.97 | 23yrs | No |
| Number of Walmart stores worldwide | r=0.96 | 15yrs | No |
| The Coca-Cola Company's stock price (KO) | r=0.92 | 21yrs | No |
| ONEOK's stock price (OKE) | r=0.9 | 21yrs | Yes! |
| Air quality in Chicago | r=0.89 | 23yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada' | r=0.87 | 19yrs | No |
| Air quality in Grand Rapids, Michigan | r=0.8 | 23yrs | No |
US household spending on healthcare also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)