Report an error
US household spending on new cars correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Nevada | r=0.96 | 6yrs | No |
Divorce rates in the United Kingdom | r=0.93 | 13yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Raven | r=0.91 | 23yrs | No |
Car crashes in the US | r=0.87 | 15yrs | No |
Google searches for 'fbi hotline' | r=0.74 | 19yrs | No |
The number of movies Harvey Keitel appeared in | r=0.64 | 23yrs | No |
The number of college mathematical science teachers in California | r=-0.85 | 19yrs | No |
US household spending on new cars also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)