Report an error
US household spending on clothing for men correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Popularity of the first name Robert | r=0.96 | 23yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Brandon | r=0.95 | 23yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Adam | r=0.95 | 23yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Sidney | r=0.95 | 23yrs | No |
| The marriage rate in Wisconsin | r=0.94 | 22yrs | No |
| The number of salespeople in Connecticut | r=0.93 | 20yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Deja | r=0.91 | 23yrs | No |
| Air pollution in Atlanta | r=0.9 | 23yrs | No |
| Kerosene used in South Korea | r=0.9 | 23yrs | No |
| The divorce rate in New York | r=0.82 | 22yrs | No |
US household spending on clothing for men also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)