Report an error
US household spending on telephone services correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of nursing assistants in Delaware | r=0.94 | 11yrs | No |
Public Library Website Visits in the UK | r=0.93 | 8yrs | No |
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico | r=0.93 | 6yrs | No |
The number of middle school special education teachers in Massachusetts | r=0.9 | 20yrs | No |
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in California | r=0.89 | 6yrs | No |
Total number of passenger vehicles sold in China | r=0.88 | 7yrs | No |
Robberies in New Hampshire | r=0.72 | 23yrs | No |
US household spending on telephone services also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)