Report an error
US household spending on processed fruits correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Tennessee | r=0.98 | 6yrs | Yes! |
Kerosene used in South Korea | r=0.94 | 23yrs | No |
GMO use in cotton in Louisiana | r=0.93 | 23yrs | Yes! |
The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin | r=0.91 | 13yrs | No |
The number of conveyor operators in Arizona | r=0.83 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Air pollution in Akron, Ohio | r=0.82 | 23yrs | Yes! |
US household spending on processed fruits also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)