Report an error
US household spending on fresh milk and cream correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Burglaries in New York | r=0.96 | 23yrs | No |
Milk consumption | r=0.94 | 22yrs | No |
The distance between Neptune and Earth | r=0.93 | 23yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Maine | r=0.92 | 22yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Nathaniel | r=0.92 | 23yrs | No |
The marriage rate in Alabama | r=0.9 | 22yrs | No |
Air pollution in Chicago | r=0.89 | 23yrs | No |
Vodafone Group's stock price (VOD) | r=0.82 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Illinois | r=0.67 | 7yrs | No |
US household spending on fresh milk and cream also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)