Report an error
Annual US household spending on tobacco products and smoking supplies correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Minnesota | r=0.96 | 8yrs | Yes! |
The number of property association managers in Connecticut | r=0.88 | 20yrs | No |
The number of postsecondary art, drama, and music teachers in Hawaii | r=0.76 | 19yrs | No |
Kerosene used in U.S. Pacific Islands | r=0.67 | 22yrs | No |
US bank failures | r=0.58 | 23yrs | No |
Patents granted to Microsoft | r=-0.93 | 12yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on tobacco products and smoking supplies also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)