Report an error
Annual US household spending on medical supplies correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Annual Revenue of Walt Disney Company | r=0.99 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Jasper | r=0.97 | 23yrs | No |
Google searches for 'do i need to go to the doctor' | r=0.97 | 19yrs | No |
Total likes of MrBeast's YouTube videos | r=0.95 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Renewable energy production in Burundi | r=0.91 | 22yrs | No |
Vertex Pharmaceuticals' stock price (VRTX) | r=0.91 | 21yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on medical supplies also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)