Report an error
Annual US household spending on prescription drugs correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oklahoma | r=0.94 | 6yrs | No |
The number of midwives in New York | r=0.94 | 11yrs | No |
The number of first-line supervisors of police and detectives in South Dakota | r=0.87 | 13yrs | No |
xkcd comics published about math | r=0.83 | 16yrs | No |
Brad Pitt's net worth | r=0.75 | 23yrs | No |
Google searches for 'who is elon musk' | r=0.67 | 18yrs | No |
West Pharmaceutical Services' stock price (WST) | r=0.66 | 21yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on prescription drugs also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)