Report an error
Annual US household spending on health insurance correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Popularity of the first name Oliver | r=1 | 23yrs | No |
| Electricity generation in Vietnam | r=0.99 | 22yrs | No |
| Arch Capital Group's stock price (ACGL) | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'do i need to go to the doctor' | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
| 3M Company's stock price (MMM) | r=0.93 | 21yrs | No |
| Pioneer Natural Resources Company's stock price (PXD) | r=0.9 | 21yrs | Yes! |
| Google searches for 'funny cat videos' | r=0.78 | 19yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on health insurance also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)