Report an error
Annual US household spending on used cars correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| The number of compliance officers in North Carolina | r=0.98 | 13yrs | No |
| Bachelor's degrees awarded in biomedical sciences | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
| Master's degrees awarded in Biological and biomedical sciences | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
| Solar power generated in Grenada | r=0.97 | 15yrs | Yes! |
| Solar power generated in Indonesia | r=0.97 | 14yrs | No |
| Total likes of The Game Theorists YouTube videos | r=0.96 | 14yrs | No |
| Associates degrees awarded in Biological sciences | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
| Patents granted to Dell | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'sushi near me' | r=0.94 | 19yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'avocado toast' | r=0.93 | 15yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on used cars also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)