Report an error
Annual US household spending on major appliances correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Total length of Deep Look YouTube videos | r=0.98 | 9yrs | Yes! |
| Google's Net Income | r=0.98 | 19yrs | No |
| Autodesk's stock price (ADSK) | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
| Take-Two Interactive Software's stock price (TTWO) | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
| Amazon.com's stock price (AMZN) | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
| Activision Blizzard's stock price (ATVI) | r=0.96 | 13yrs | No |
| Netflix's stock price (NFLX) | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
| Medtronic's stock price (MDT) | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
| Average length of Matt Parker's YouTube videos | r=0.93 | 12yrs | No |
| Advanced Micro Devices' stock price (AMD) | r=0.78 | 21yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on major appliances also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)