Report an error
Annual US household spending on utilities correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of physical therapists in Florida | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
The number of commercial pilots in Florida | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
Telkom Indonesia (Persero) Tbk PT's stock price (Persero) | r=0.89 | 21yrs | Yes! |
The number of college psychology teachers in Massachusetts | r=0.88 | 20yrs | No |
Air quality in Grand Rapids, Michigan | r=0.79 | 23yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on utilities also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)