Report an error
Annual US household spending on housing correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Inflation in the US | r=0.98 | 23yrs | No |
| Fossil fuel use in Bahrain | r=0.98 | 22yrs | No |
| Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Texas | r=0.96 | 6yrs | No |
| Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=0.96 | 23yrs | No |
| Alphabet's stock price (GOOGL) | r=0.96 | 18yrs | No |
| Aflac's stock price (AFL) | r=0.95 | 21yrs | No |
| CME Group's stock price (CME) | r=0.93 | 20yrs | Yes! |
| Lululemon's stock price (LULU) | r=0.91 | 15yrs | No |
| Average Cost of a 30-Second Ad Commercial during the Academy Awards | r=0.91 | 21yrs | No |
| Adobe's stock price (ADBE) | r=0.87 | 21yrs | No |
| Points scored by the Detroit Lions | r=0.54 | 23yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on housing also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)