Report an error
Annual US household spending on fresh vegetables correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Butter consumption | r=0.98 | 22yrs | No |
| Canadian National Railway Company's stock price (CNI) | r=0.98 | 21yrs | No |
| Microsoft's Worldwide Earnings | r=0.98 | 21yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'do i need to go to the doctor' | r=0.97 | 19yrs | No |
| The Coca-Cola Company's stock price (KO) | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'my cat scratched me' | r=0.96 | 15yrs | No |
| Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=0.96 | 23yrs | No |
| The number of mechanical engineers in Pennsylvania | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
| The Walt Disney Company's stock price (DIS) | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
| Wind power generated in Poland | r=0.95 | 22yrs | No |
| Cummins' stock price (CMI) | r=0.95 | 21yrs | Yes! |
| Emerson Electric Co.'s stock price (EMR) | r=0.92 | 21yrs | No |
| Amazon.com's stock price (AMZN) | r=0.91 | 21yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on fresh vegetables also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)