Report an error
Annual US household spending on cereals and bakery products correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Microsoft's Worldwide Earnings | r=0.98 | 21yrs | No |
| Lululemon's stock price (LULU) | r=0.98 | 15yrs | No |
| McDonald's stock price (MCD) | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
| Electricity generation in Ghana | r=0.97 | 22yrs | No |
| The number of medical assistants in Indiana | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
| US Wind Power Generation Capacity | r=0.96 | 23yrs | No |
| Deere & Company's stock price (DE) | r=0.95 | 21yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'i have a headache' | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
| Netflix's stock price (NFLX) | r=0.92 | 20yrs | No |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s stock price (JPM) | r=0.91 | 21yrs | No |
| Searches for 'never gonna give you up' | r=0.87 | 17yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on cereals and bakery products also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)