Report an error
Customer satisfaction with YouTube correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Number of Grand Slam Finals played by Roger Federer | r=0.97 | 6yrs | No |
GMO use in cotton in Arkansas | r=0.83 | 12yrs | Yes! |
Average views of Mark Rober YouTube videos | r=0.82 | 11yrs | No |
Mozzarella cheese consumption | r=0.77 | 12yrs | No |
The number of movies Diane Keaton appeared in | r=-0.57 | 12yrs | No |
Customer satisfaction with YouTube also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)