Report an error
Customer satisfaction with Dollar General correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of tax examiners and collectors, and revenue agents in Colorado | r=0.91 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Kerosene used in Uruguay | r=0.89 | 14yrs | No |
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Serbia | r=0.86 | 14yrs | No |
Air quality in Crescent City, California | r=0.86 | 14yrs | Yes! |
Culinary Associates degrees awarded | r=0.86 | 10yrs | No |
Burglary rates in the US | r=0.79 | 14yrs | No |
The number of movies Penelope Cruz appeared in | r=0.67 | 14yrs | No |
The number of movies Mila Kunis appeared in | r=0.62 | 14yrs | No |
Customer satisfaction with Dollar General also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)