Report an error
Customer satisfaction with Macy's correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
How insightful PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are | r=0.91 | 6yrs | No |
How clickbait-y MinuteEarth YouTube video titles are | r=0.89 | 8yrs | Yes! |
Votes for Republican Senators in Nebraska | r=0.88 | 6yrs | No |
How fun CGP Grey YouTube video titles are | r=0.86 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Malika | r=0.83 | 16yrs | Yes! |
Master's degrees awarded in Precision production | r=0.8 | 9yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Eritrea | r=0.78 | 16yrs | Yes! |
Air quality in Seattle, Washington | r=0.77 | 16yrs | No |
Google searches for 'i am tired' | r=0.72 | 16yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Shaye | r=-0.87 | 16yrs | No |
Customer satisfaction with Macy's also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)