Report an error
Customer satisfaction with UPS correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of secretaries in Rhode Island | r=0.93 | 12yrs | Yes! |
How good LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are | r=0.92 | 7yrs | No |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Pennsylvania | r=0.86 | 9yrs | No |
The number of vending machine repairers in Ohio | r=0.84 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Lamar | r=0.73 | 28yrs | Yes! |
Freezing temperatures in Detroit | r=0.45 | 26yrs | No |
Customer satisfaction with UPS also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)