Report an error
Customer satisfaction with American Airlines correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Google searches for 'smol' | r=0.96 | 18yrs | Yes! |
The number of chiropractors in Utah | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Engineering technologies | r=0.93 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Master's degrees awarded in Engineering | r=0.86 | 10yrs | No |
Air pollution in Salinas, California | r=0.66 | 28yrs | Yes! |
Customer satisfaction with American Airlines also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)