Report an error
The divorce rate in Virginia correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Milk consumption | r=0.96 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Amy | r=0.95 | 23yrs | No |
Burglaries in Virginia | r=0.95 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Kalyn | r=0.92 | 23yrs | No |
Ice cream consumption | r=0.89 | 23yrs | No |
NASA's budget as a percentage of the total US Federal Budget | r=0.89 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Jenna | r=0.88 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Mckenzie | r=0.86 | 23yrs | No |
Air pollution in Virginia Beach, Virginia | r=0.85 | 23yrs | Yes! |
Brick cheese consumption | r=0.83 | 23yrs | No |
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Virginia | r=0.77 | 6yrs | No |
Air pollution in Richmond, Virginia | r=0.67 | 23yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Virginia also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)