Report an error
The divorce rate in Ohio correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Master's degrees awarded in linguistics | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Jacob | r=0.97 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Joshua | r=0.93 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Armando | r=0.91 | 23yrs | No |
Number of Slot Machines in Nevada | r=0.9 | 23yrs | No |
Air pollution in Dayton | r=0.86 | 23yrs | Yes! |
Air pollution in Cleveland | r=0.83 | 23yrs | Yes! |
Arson in Ohio | r=0.83 | 23yrs | No |
Air pollution in Akron, Ohio | r=0.8 | 23yrs | No |
Air pollution in Dayton | r=0.78 | 23yrs | Yes! |
Air quality in Akron, Ohio | r=-0.8 | 23yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Ohio also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)