Report an error
The divorce rate in New Jersey correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of salespeople in New Jersey | r=0.94 | 19yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Dental assisting | r=0.89 | 11yrs | No |
NASA's budget as a percentage of the total US Federal Budget | r=0.82 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Justice | r=0.79 | 23yrs | No |
The number of movies Maggie Smith appeared in | r=0.54 | 23yrs | No |
Number of goals scored by the winning team in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final | r=0.53 | 23yrs | No |
American-type cheese consumption | r=-0.81 | 23yrs | No |
The divorce rate in New Jersey also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)