Report an error
The divorce rate in Montana correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
United States music album sales | r=0.91 | 15yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Abigail | r=0.91 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Conner | r=0.84 | 23yrs | No |
Nuclear power generation in France | r=0.83 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Issac | r=0.81 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Chris | r=0.8 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Alan | r=0.75 | 23yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Montana also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)