Report an error
The divorce rate in Idaho correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Milk consumption | r=0.98 | 23yrs | Yes! |
US average milk-fat content of milk fat and skim solids byproduct fluid beverage milk | r=0.97 | 22yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Samuel | r=0.93 | 23yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Liberal arts | r=0.92 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Zakary | r=0.92 | 23yrs | No |
Asthma attacks in American children | r=0.89 | 21yrs | No |
Asthma attacks in American children | r=0.86 | 21yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Idaho also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)