Report an error
The divorce rate in Connecticut correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
How insightful Technology Connections YouTube video titles are | r=0.92 | 7yrs | No |
How geeky SciShow Space YouTube video titles are | r=0.89 | 8yrs | No |
Global iPod Sales | r=0.85 | 9yrs | No |
Petroluem consumption in United Kingdom | r=0.83 | 23yrs | No |
Kerosene used in French Polynesia | r=0.82 | 23yrs | No |
Total Runs Scored by Chicago Cubs Team in National League (Central and East Division) | r=0.8 | 23yrs | Yes! |
Fossil fuel use in Germany | r=0.78 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Aaron | r=0.74 | 23yrs | No |
Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper' | r=-0.85 | 18yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Connecticut also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)