Report an error
The divorce rate in Alaska correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Master's degrees awarded in linguistics | r=0.98 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Associates degrees awarded in Business | r=0.93 | 11yrs | No |
Google searches for 'xkcd' | r=0.92 | 15yrs | No |
The number of electricians in Alaska | r=0.82 | 19yrs | No |
The number of zoologists in Alaska | r=0.81 | 19yrs | No |
The number of library assistants in Alaska | r=0.78 | 19yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in Djibouti | r=0.76 | 23yrs | No |
Global Rice Consumption | r=-0.93 | 13yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Alaska also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)