Report an error
The marriage rate in Wyoming correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Julia | r=0.99 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Nickolas | r=0.97 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Alize | r=0.97 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Yajaira | r=0.96 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Marco | r=0.96 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Kristofer | r=0.95 | 23yrs | No |
Ice cream consumption | r=0.95 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Larissa | r=0.94 | 23yrs | No |
Google searches for 'Britney Spears' | r=0.93 | 14yrs | No |
The distance between Neptune and Mercury | r=0.93 | 23yrs | No |
US household spending on clothin for women | r=0.93 | 22yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Rolando | r=0.92 | 23yrs | No |
Kerosene used in South Korea | r=0.9 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Grace | r=0.9 | 23yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Legal professions | r=0.87 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Nia | r=0.86 | 23yrs | No |
The marriage rate in Wyoming also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)