Report an error
The marriage rate in Idaho correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Popularity of the first name Karina | r=0.99 | 23yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Jasmine | r=0.99 | 23yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Samantha | r=0.99 | 23yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Tyler | r=0.98 | 23yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Sarah | r=0.98 | 23yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Alissa | r=0.97 | 23yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Mary | r=0.97 | 23yrs | No |
| Ice cream consumption | r=0.96 | 23yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Earl | r=0.96 | 23yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Tamia | r=0.96 | 23yrs | No |
| Arson in Idaho | r=0.95 | 21yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'snoop dog' | r=0.95 | 18yrs | No |
The marriage rate in Idaho also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)