Report an error
The marriage rate in District of Columbia correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history' | r=0.87 | 18yrs | No |
Michael Schumacher's Formula One Ranking | r=0.87 | 14yrs | No |
Blue cheese consumption | r=0.86 | 23yrs | No |
The number of movies Elizabeth Olsen appeared in | r=0.85 | 23yrs | Yes! |
The number of movies Benedict Cumberbatch appeared in | r=0.77 | 20yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Communications technologies | r=0.64 | 10yrs | No |
The marriage rate in District of Columbia also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)