Report an error
The marriage rate in California correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Associates degrees awarded in Dental assisting | r=0.93 | 11yrs | No |
Kerosene used in French Polynesia | r=0.91 | 23yrs | No |
British Open Golf Championship winner's score | r=0.89 | 23yrs | No |
Visitors to Disneyland | r=0.84 | 15yrs | No |
Movie ticket sales in the U.S. and Canada by year | r=0.78 | 23yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in Germany | r=0.78 | 23yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Australia | r=0.76 | 23yrs | No |
Air pollution in Santa Cruz, California | r=-0.88 | 22yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'i am once again' meme | r=-0.9 | 16yrs | No |
Average length of MinuteEarth YouTube videos | r=-0.99 | 9yrs | No |
The marriage rate in California also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)