Report an error
The marriage rate in Arizona correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Popularity of the first name Chastity | r=0.97 | 23yrs | No |
| Carjackings in the US | r=0.94 | 23yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Holly | r=0.93 | 23yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Clifford | r=0.93 | 23yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Beth | r=0.93 | 23yrs | No |
| Kerosene used in South Korea | r=0.92 | 23yrs | No |
| US household spending on books | r=0.91 | 22yrs | No |
| US average milk-fat content of frozen dairy products | r=0.9 | 22yrs | No |
| The distance between Neptune and Earth | r=0.89 | 23yrs | No |
| Violent crime rates | r=0.87 | 23yrs | No |
| The number of boiler operators in Arizona | r=0.84 | 19yrs | No |
| Processed cheese consumption | r=0.74 | 23yrs | No |
The marriage rate in Arizona also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)