Report an error
The marriage rate in Alabama correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The distance between Neptune and Earth | r=0.97 | 23yrs | No |
The distance between Neptune and the Sun | r=0.97 | 23yrs | No |
Ice cream consumption | r=0.95 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Alex | r=0.94 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Haley | r=0.94 | 23yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Education | r=0.93 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Pedro | r=0.93 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Peter | r=0.93 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Tasha | r=0.93 | 23yrs | No |
Kerosene used in South Korea | r=0.91 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Abbie | r=0.9 | 23yrs | No |
US household spending on fresh milk and cream | r=0.9 | 22yrs | No |
Air pollution in Huntsville | r=0.89 | 23yrs | Yes! |
Air pollution in Birmingham | r=0.88 | 23yrs | Yes! |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Legal professions | r=0.88 | 10yrs | No |
Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama | r=0.85 | 23yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Halle | r=0.84 | 23yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Nursing | r=0.69 | 11yrs | No |
The marriage rate in Alabama also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)