Report an error
Points allowed by the Tennessee Titans correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Average viewer count per season of "How I Met Your Mother" | r=0.85 | 9yrs | No |
US average milk-fat content of cream products | r=0.85 | 7yrs | No |
Portion of all US dairy skim-solids allocated to the production of cream products | r=0.82 | 7yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Visual and performing arts | r=0.74 | 10yrs | No |
The distance between Venus and Earth | r=-0.46 | 25yrs | No |
Points allowed by the Tennessee Titans also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)