Report an error
Points allowed by the New York Giants correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Number of Lawyers in the United States | r=0.7 | 34yrs | No |
US kids in public school | r=0.64 | 33yrs | No |
US Annual Tax Revenue | r=0.6 | 47yrs | No |
The distance between Neptune and Earth | r=-0.6 | 49yrs | No |
Motor vehicle thefts | r=-0.69 | 38yrs | No |
Points allowed by the New York Giants also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)