Report an error
Points allowed by the New England Patriots correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Global sales revenue of elevators and escalators | r=0.86 | 7yrs | No |
| Global revenue from elevator and escalator sales | r=0.86 | 7yrs | No |
| How nerdy Computerphile YouTube video titles are | r=0.71 | 11yrs | No |
| Number of Public Library Members in the UK | r=0.67 | 12yrs | No |
| International Business Machines' stock price (IBM) | r=0.54 | 22yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Infant | r=0.53 | 39yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Brittni | r=0.46 | 37yrs | No |
| The number of movies Joey King appeared in | r=0.46 | 17yrs | No |
| The number of cashiers in Massachusetts | r=-0.52 | 20yrs | No |
Points allowed by the New England Patriots also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)