Report an error
Points allowed by the Detroit Lions correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Associates degrees awarded in Architecture | r=0.88 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Valentin | r=0.7 | 48yrs | No |
New York Times Fiction Best Sellers | r=0.69 | 40yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Emmanuel | r=0.67 | 48yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Business | r=0.66 | 10yrs | No |
USA Population | r=0.63 | 48yrs | No |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.6 | 44yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Michigan | r=0.52 | 47yrs | No |
The number of movies Samuel L. Jackson appeared in | r=0.49 | 47yrs | No |
The number of movies Morgan Freeman appeared in | r=0.48 | 46yrs | No |
Points allowed by the Detroit Lions also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)