Report an error
Points allowed by the Chicago Bears correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Total likes of PBS Space Time YouTube videos | r=0.9 | 9yrs | No |
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Illinois | r=0.69 | 12yrs | No |
US household spending on eggs | r=0.67 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Colton | r=0.58 | 48yrs | No |
Air quality in Chicago | r=0.57 | 44yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Israel | r=0.55 | 43yrs | No |
The number of movies Bradley Cooper appeared in | r=0.48 | 23yrs | No |
Air pollution in Chicago | r=-0.57 | 44yrs | No |
Points allowed by the Chicago Bears also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)