Report an error
Points allowed by the Baltimore Ravens correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
How fun AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are | r=0.81 | 12yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in South Sudan | r=0.65 | 10yrs | No |
Wind power generated in Aruba | r=0.6 | 13yrs | No |
Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression | r=0.53 | 27yrs | No |
US average milk-fat content of yogurt, nonfrozen | r=0.51 | 22yrs | No |
How fun Extra History YouTube video titles are | r=0.49 | 12yrs | No |
Points allowed by the Baltimore Ravens also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)