Report an error
Points allowed by the Arizona Cardinals correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Total likes of Deep Look YouTube videos | r=0.87 | 10yrs | No |
| How cool MrBeast's YouTube video titles are | r=0.85 | 12yrs | No |
| Solar power generated in Mauritania | r=0.82 | 9yrs | No |
| Bachelor's degrees awarded in Business | r=0.81 | 10yrs | No |
Points allowed by the Arizona Cardinals also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)