Report an error
Points scored by the Pittsburgh Steelers correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
How insightful Deep Look YouTube video titles are | r=0.84 | 10yrs | No |
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania | r=0.82 | 12yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Aruba | r=0.63 | 36yrs | No |
Total Points scored by the New England Patriots in the NFL season | r=0.54 | 48yrs | No |
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania | r=0.53 | 11yrs | No |
Points scored by the Pittsburgh Steelers also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)