Report an error
Points scored by the Dallas Cowboys correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
US hotel industry's revenue per available room | r=0.88 | 14yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on electricity | r=0.74 | 23yrs | Yes! |
GMO use in cotton in Texas | r=0.71 | 23yrs | No |
GMO use in corn | r=0.7 | 24yrs | No |
Hispanic cheese consumption | r=0.61 | 26yrs | No |
The number of movies Chris Evans appeared in | r=0.56 | 24yrs | No |
Points scored by the Dallas Cowboys also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)