Report an error
Season wins for the Philadelphia Eagles correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The average number of likes on 3Blue1Brown YouTube videos | r=0.73 | 9yrs | No |
How fun 'Be Smart' science YouTube video titles are | r=0.67 | 11yrs | No |
US household spending on food | r=0.58 | 23yrs | No |
The number of movies Jason Momoa appeared in | r=0.49 | 21yrs | No |
Visitors to Disney Worlds Magic Kingdom | r=0.45 | 15yrs | No |
The number of movies Vin Diesel appeared in | r=0.45 | 40yrs | No |
xkcd comics published about politics | r=-0.73 | 17yrs | No |
Season wins for the Philadelphia Eagles also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)