Report an error
Season wins for the New England Patriots correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
How geeky SciShow Space YouTube video titles are | r=0.97 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Total views on SciShow Space YouTube videos | r=0.93 | 10yrs | No |
The number of middle school teachers in Massachusetts | r=0.85 | 13yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Dental assisting | r=0.83 | 11yrs | No |
Total Points scored by the New England Patriots in the NFL season | r=0.82 | 48yrs | No |
US Highway Vehicle Gasoline Consumption | r=0.77 | 29yrs | No |
The distance between Uranus and Saturn | r=0.61 | 49yrs | Yes! |
Season wins for the New England Patriots also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)