Report an error
Season wins for the Dallas Cowboys correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
How fun Technology Connections YouTube video titles are | r=0.93 | 9yrs | No |
Kerosene used in Former Czechoslovakia | r=0.83 | 9yrs | No |
The number of locksmiths and safe repairers in Texas | r=0.54 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the 'harambe' meme | r=0.5 | 8yrs | No |
The number of tax preparers in Texas | r=0.49 | 20yrs | No |
Season wins for the Dallas Cowboys also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)