Report an error
Season wins for the Buffalo Bills correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Global Rice Consumption | r=0.88 | 14yrs | No |
The number of occupational health and safety technicians in New York | r=0.85 | 19yrs | Yes! |
Solar power generated in Hong Kong | r=0.85 | 13yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs | r=0.81 | 23yrs | Yes! |
The number of movies Denzel Washington appeared in | r=0.53 | 47yrs | No |
Air quality in Buffalo | r=0.52 | 44yrs | No |
Season wins for the Buffalo Bills also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)